The History of the Band-Aid
Did you Know?Eminem’s mother filed an $11 million defamation lawsuit against him because of his lyrics about odishahaalchaal.com settled for $25, and $23, of that went to her lawyerA mason in ’s Jerusalem left his wooden ladder behind after doing some work on a church and now it can’t be moved without the agreement & permission of six different Christian leaders. Mar 02, · Originally created as a means to treat small wounds more easily with bandages that could be self-applied and were durable enough to withstand the day-to-day activities of most people, this invention has remained relatively unchanged in its nearly year history. However, market sales for the first line of commercially produced Band-Aids weren.
And then, believe it or not, there were eight! Today, and for the rest of the week, we will work our way through the Elate Eight, aka the Round of Saintly Kitsch. What exactly is saintly kitsch? Or that you know it when you see it. But, in the end, we werre this round what year were bandaids invented out some levity, even as we continue our inspiring Lenten journey. Camillus began his life as eere soldier and a gambler, hardly the raw ingredients yeaar a man who would become a saint.
But God had different plans for Camillus. His journey to sainthood began in earnest when Camillus developed a leg wound that simply would not heal. You can read it for yourself in this cleverly titled book, A Gamble for God.
With a title like that, you know the contents yexr pure literary poetry. Guess what does fuel surcharge mean It baandaids complete with a quote that may or may not be something he actually said.
Well, just in case, you can own this carved statue of Camillus — rough and edgy, just like him! Camillus is a saint because of the amazing work he did offering care and prayers inented the sick and dying. He was a holy hospital administrator, priest, and ran an entire order of lay and ordained who cared for the sick. That takes some admirable organization skills. Camillus founded an order that wears a red cross as a sign of their vows to care for and serve those who are sick. How to speak like australian this time of pandemic, we can all do what banndaids need to do to keep each other as safe as possible — wear a mask, keep physical distance, bandakds get the vaccine.
When we do that, we can all be SuperPeople and get a nifty red cross shirt to wear. We begin in Savannah, Georgia, home to one of many historically Black churches in the United States named for Benedict.
Here in the heart of the old South, formerly enslaved persons and their descendants have gathered for almost years. In this place, the community gathered both to share their faith and to provide education for all. Continuing further south we find ourselves in Venezuela, where different regions of the country hold festivals in honor of San Benedict in December and January.
Each of wege festivals is a inventes of cultures — where indigenous South American meets Spanish meets African. The fiestas de San Benito provide a touchpoint for Afro-Venezuelans to celebrate their heritage and contributions to society.
We can hike the nearby hills, recalling his time in a hermitage. There, overlooking Palermo, we can spend time reflecting on inventes example of Benedict while sitting under a year old cypress tree, said to have been planted by the Saint during his life. Camillus de Lellis vs.
Benedict the Moor. You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed. This ex-soldier, no stranger to drill, Told his brothers to wfre for the ill. So together they healed Those who fell on the field — And today they are healing them still. As always, nicely done, John! Especially in a world that is increasingly divided, he is an enduring symbol of hope. Struggling to decide having voted for both in previous wat, I opted to splash in the shallows. Based purely on the kitsch alone, I voted for Camillus.
On the day I am scheduled for my first Covid vaccination, Camillus is my man. And thank you John Cabot for putting a lilt in the start of my day. So happy for you! We say, tongue firmly in cheek, that 2 weeks after our second shot, we achieved immortality! Actually, we became significantly less vulnerable and extremely thankful.
After working for several years in laboratories and hospitals and knowing people doing basic research, I voted for Camillus. Now to Google Jesus bandaids. I do love saintly kitsch and your limericks! My appointment is today also. But this past year probably what is the memorandum of association. Indeed, I have to vote for Camillus. As an RN there is no other choice for me. In spite of vandaids amazing Benedict the Moor.
Just added it to my bucket list. Benedict is another good reason to go to Palermo. I voted for Camillis the rough-edged healer, in honor of my father knvented law, a real-life House character. Because wear those masks, bandalds safe, and schedule that vaccination.
I vote for Benedict the Moor, who came out of slavery, who had a lifelong commitment to God, who rose above racial barriers to be canonized, who had the gift of healing, and lowes how to build a gate was a divine cook.
Predictably, my young white mind, ivented unaware of the church. This is SO hard. Camillus certainly had quite the conversion, and used his strength for those who desperately needed it.
Benedict served God in the kitchen, and welcomed sisters and brothers in a time of hunger, accepting them as they were at the moment they showed up hungry.
Yep, pretty sure…. Everyone yezr Magneto is more powerful sere awesome than Professor X. Vote for Benedict, not the whimpering old white man. I went back and read about both Camillus and Benedict and only then did i realize that BOTH were engaged in ministries of healing.
This is a really hard contest with both Saints being very inspirational. I must say hear I adore Camillus, with his how to learn and speak in english and prickly exterior, but the way that he pushes through his quarrelsome names to become a Saint.
His Kitsch is amazing our RC siblings seem to love him! He is a little fixated on getting to Heaven in my opinion but that may have been due to the pain of his injured leg. In the end I voted for Benedict, because I think now is the right time for us to raise our voices on behalf of our Saints of African descent.
I think both of these Saints have brought blessings into our lives today. All honor to St. Nevertheless, after spending several years working in hospitals and labs, my vote goes to St.
I have to say, the Jesus bandaids raise kitsch to a new level. What loyal church member can not relate to the sentiment of the Camillus pillow? Stewardship calls! Piles of dirty dishes! I dunno. For being a very rough diamond whom God loved—as we should remember to find the diamond somewhere in our un-lovable brothers and sisters.
For that quotation, which I am going to cling to. And yes, vaccine, mask, wash hands, social distance. But I wish Benedict could be runner-up at the end. I yearr Moor because we need more like him. Invejted we could learn and benefit certainly no doubt from Camillus. They are both speaking to my heart…. I ihvented glad God gives us all different gifts to use to his glory…. Oh, my! Too close to call at this invenyed. Benedict is more likeable and I loved the travelogue showing how universal he is.
I decided to go with Camillus because of the amazing kitsch but it was a tough decision. I have been so impressed with everything written about Benedict. Consistently good and gentle throughout his life. My utmost respect and admiration goes to those who never have the need to overcome the rough edges. But based on kitsch alone I voted for Camillus.
I wonder what the free prize is in the Jesus bandaids? It was a hard choice and they are only a few votes apart is I type thisbut I voted for Benedict of Palermo nice that werw write up mentioned him by that name. So for the volunteers who have been able to keep that ministry going, I vote for Benedict.
And if you are interested in learning more about our hunger ministries. I also have voted for both of these saints since the first round. Yer was pretty convinced bandzids Benedict would win, so I went ahead and voted how to remove stains underarm stains Camillus for the kitsch — so well done, Laurie Brock.
But as of now the voting is too close to call! I would like to note that as well as setting aside 24 saints to await another chance at the Golden Halo but not next year!
You might also like
Invented in , Q-Tips were originally called Baby Gays; then Q-Tip Baby Gays, then finally just Q-Tips. The Q stands for quality. In , David Bowie released an internet provider called BowieNet. Subscribers were offered exclusive content and a BowieNet email. It was shut down in Standing around burns calories. An year old with dwarfism played the 8-year-old Grinch in The Grinch (). He passed away two years after the film was released. He passed away two years after the film was released. Rebecca Felton was the first woman to ever serve for the United States Senate – but she only served for one day. Apr 03, · Chart #4 shows yr Treasury yields, which have surged over bps from last year's all-time lows. Yet yields today are only marginally higher than they were prior to the onset of the Covid crisis. Back in February of last year, a casual observer would have remarked that Treasury yields were exceptionally—and historically—very low.
Buffett never suggested using the tool as a timing tool but more to assess general valuation levels and to moderate expectations, if applicable. It's interesting to remember that he had voiced concerns about high and rising corporate profit margins as a percentage of underlying real economic activity.. He had in effect suggested that this would mean that the trickle down was no longer working according to the secret sauce elaborated in the Constitution.
Using global GDP as the denominator gives an interesting perspective but does not appear to be a useful tool to asses the general level of corporate valuations in the US. For US corporations this rise in profits reflects growing profit margins and one has to decide if we have reached a permanently elevated plateau. An aspect which is clear is that the more impressive growth outside of the US especially in China has caused the weigth of the US economy to progressively go down on a relative basis.
The trickle down has indeed slowed down to a trickle. Interesting times: today, there was this debate about housing. Some suggested that there was a bubble ready to burst type and others said that this was the first inning of an upcoming boom. The Fed calls this the wealth effect and i continue to wonder if it's real wealth.
Another superb wrap-up of the US and even global economics-business scene by Scott Grannis. Biden's buddies on Wall Street, Hollywood, Silicon Valley and in the military-business complex will probably do fine. I must begrudgingly give credit to Biden, if he actually gets the hell out of Afghanistan. The US must develop a foreign-military-trade policy that first benefits Americans.
The globalists have a different agenda. The latest PCE core posted at 1. As usual, I am uncertain about interest rates. Today we have global capital markets, and money is a fungible commodity. Most money-printing is not done by the central banks, but by fractional-reserve commercial banks. You know when you take out of home loan? You know where the money came from? Your bank printed the money. Here is a stray thought: The world of fractional-reserve commercial banks preceded that of central banks.
The fractional-reserve banks, which borrow short to lend long, and are heavily leveraged at that, often collapsed. So central banks were invented to provide liquidity when needed to the inherently fragile commercial banking sector. Commercial banks remain influential through the process and o this day. This is how our monetary system evolved. But does this system make sense? In present circumstance, do money-financed fiscal programs make more sense? I think so, but unfortunately, politics and interest-group politics get involved.
In what specific circumstances do 'money'-financed fiscal programs make sense? Please consider fiscal dominance, crowding out, debt intensity etc. Meanwhile, the risks are growing that Russia invades Ukraine, or China invades or blocks Taiwan, or both - perhaps even coordinated. IMHO, money-financed fiscal programs make sense in any recession and maybe permanently.
Why should new money creation take place only through the commercial banking system only? Is such a system divinely-inspired? Deficit spending builds up debt, but money financed fiscal programs do not. Although, if the Federal Reserve simply builds up its balance sheet, it is as if the programs were money-financed anyway. To be sure, commercial banks want to retain their central role in the creation of new money.
It has been very profitable, and today commercial banks are even paid money to do nothing, and sit on reserves. But what is in the interest of commercial banks, and in the interest of taxpayers, may be two different things. One could argue that debt monetization has not really occurred in developed countries although perpetually maintaining a central bank balance sheet proportional to government debt issues is a conceptual equivalent this has been going on for more than 10 years now.
However, when asked, central banks do not depict their actions as monetization and, in fact, often vehemently oppose the idea. Why is that? It seems to be a game of subterfuge and the message is that the constraints will be developing inflation and an overheating economy but monetary velocity has been falling going against growing monetary supply.
What if inflation or sustainable growth never comes? The next logical step then would be helicopter money, the purest form of money-financed public deficits. Isn't there a trust issue then with 'we' the people? Another major issue with money-financed deficits is that decisions then become concentrated in the hands of a few. Long ago, there was a similar argument that went on between John Law who pushed for debt monetization and Baron Montesquieu who suggested a wide and balanced distribution of power among participants.
It's interesting to note that John Law's money printing experiment failed and the Founding Fathers were inspired by the concept of separation of power described by Montesquieu.
Fractional-reserve in the banking system was the result of some kind of compromise reached over a long period and the idea of a central bank may be non-essential but, if it exists, central banks should remain independent from the branch of government that does not naturally see constraints on spending money-financed or otherwise.
Money velocity in this current QE regime goes straight down. And this is what we've seen since - velocity has drifted ever downward. The only pause in the decline has been very recent and that's because, unlike traditional QE, money was put straight into the hands of the people.
I know I'll get a bunch of push-back on this idea. So let me say it isn't my first choice. It's just better than the QE playbook that's been run for most of the last twelve and a half years. Let me also acknowledge that this program would be an impediment to work. At that time bring back the payroll tax but at only half of the current rate for both employee and employer and lift the cap on wages.
And while they're at it, Dems could publicly commit to getting back to being the party of the people and abandon any effort to mess with the SALT. This would bring about boogie woogie boom times. Grechster: Get it right. I am a fan of payroll tax holidays offset by the Federal Reserve buying Treasuries and placing them into the Social Security. Ergo, we get new money creation by cutting taxes on workers and businesses. Productive people. I think you are onto something when you say that conventional quantitative easing does not benefit the broader economy.
But US commercial banks get a lot of reserves under conventional quantitative easingand guess whatthey are paid interest on those reserves. For doing nothing. The comment about Social Security is fascinating. A phase has been entered whereby the pay-as-you-go will no longer meet objectives meaning that future beneficiaries in the next 15 to 25 years , if nothing is changed, will have lower payouts.
For changes to occur tough discussions , the following options have to be considered: -raise payroll tax -lower benefits or delay age of retirement -appropriate funds from other parts of the government budget -issue debt It is interesting to imagine FDR announcing the program in the 30s: "The Social Security Program will be funded with free printed money".
How have we not thought of this sooner? Last i checked, accounting is still based on double entry. Unknown: I see no problem with using helicopter money to finance Social Security. One could argue the US has been financing a global military through borrowing and helicopter drops since Where is the inflation?
Even more dramatic is Japan. Half of the that nation's gigantic national debt is held by the Bank of Japan. The consumer price index was in in Japan, and nearly that now though sinking. That is 33 years not just of low inflation, but no inflation. Switzerland has a population of 8. If you have a theory about what causes inflation, should it not apply in the real world?
Sure, a nation can engage to too much money creation, whether through its commercial bank system, or through money-financed helicopter drops. A nation can also starve its monetary system of money, and trigger a Great Depression.
In the US we had a commercial banking system that was inherently fragile, that is they borrowed short, leveraged to the hilt, and lent long. The commercial banks created a central bank in to bail out busted banks when needed. Bank panics were common in the US. Given that commercial banks are systemic to macroeconomic health, there is good and bad in central banks, probably mostly good. But should we sacralize commercial banks as the only way to create money?
BTW, the guys who met at Jekyll Island were all bankers. Gee, what plan did you expect them to come up with? Paul Warburg was also there. Warburg was a major driver force and architect behind the plan. Warburg had written about this potential need to deal with a financial panic months prior to the actual Panic. However, that does not mean that even worse possibilities should be adopted.
The problem with money creation private, hybrid QE-type or public is that too much of it, whatever its origin is likely to result in poor outcomes, possibly in a non-linear way. Yes Japan and the most recent experience in the US shows that inflation is not picking up.